False advertising is prevalent throughout the virtual currency industry, but today I’d like to take the time to point out one particular outrageous example. The fairly popular virtual currency vendor wowmine.com bases its entire business on a single claim that they advertise everywhere.
“As Low As $5/1000 W0W Gold <5 Minute Delivery, US/EU On Sale”
They specialize in an automated vendor process where after placing an order you automatically receive a phone call and automatically confirm your order (fraud prevention). You can then log into your account on the website and click a button that says you are ready for your gold and they have a bot automatically log in and deliver the gold to you (note: you are told to be at a certain mailbox location before hand and have to be a certain distance from the bot, etc.). This is a really cool concept, although it only works when they have currency to delivery. It doesn’t matter how fast that automatic bot can log on or how few (costly) human resources it saves if they don’t have currency on stock to deliver to you. Here is wowmine’s big problem.
Wowmine is a Chinese company specializes in cheap currency. You can read our full review of them here. However, they are completely unable to keep an adequate stock of currency. As such the claim that they deliver in less than five minutes never happens. The surprising thing is on the website they tell you how much stock they have for every server (which they claim is updated hourly and 90% accurate). However in reality these numbers are 100% fictional and completely false. They mean nothing. They are intentionally engineered to deceive you. They also have a list of “average delivery times” that they allegedly update every 10 days. Simply looking at the data and our test results along with hundreds of customers claims quickly showed that this data was also doctored.
They went through a lot of trouble to be intentionally deceitful. Anyways, when I contacted wowmine’s live support about this matter after a bit of arguing I received the following response:
...
Read more
The following is a debate over the past five days I've had with Reddit user Blackhaz. The debate started with his response to my post of the Blizzard vs. MDY (Glider) Case and a defense of the RMT industry. The original comments can be found here. It's nice to know that there are still places where you can have civil reasoned discussions on the internet.
Blackhaz: Exchange 1
I would love to see an actual lawyer expand on this case and what it actually means. I can't really see how much has changed. This type of software has always been better off being developed outside of the USA. I guess developing software which only has the purpose of violating the terms of service every single user has agreed to is now off limits as well. Is it really negative that the government protects against software who's only commercial viability is based off of the disruption of the service of others? This is not about attacking users or restricting their rights, it's about stopping massive abuse of the system.
... Read more